[gouriproutray]

In that question science aa is a array name, so only specifying the array name(like aa what i mentioned in the question) gives the address of the 1st element if it is a 1-d array. And simply specifying aa+1 gives the address of the 2nd element (if 1st one is 100,then 2nd one is 102).but what my compiler shows i mentioned in the question..now i am asking that is my compiler is a wrong one anything theory behind this.that shows the different out put



Actually i have a c++ compiler.but that's not a turbo compiler..